Thursday, August 13, 2009

What you say???


Friday, July 31, 2009

A Testament To Fail

This entire site is a gigantic, creepy stalker shrine to fail. It's like they condensed trillions of terabytes of fail into one webpage. Have fun at home! Try to count the logical fallacies in this one segment!

DarwinsPredictions: "Evolutionists are commonly surprised by the scientific evidences from biology. The evidences do not fit the evolutionary expectations. Evolutionists argue strenuously that these surprises are not problems, but rather are signs of scientific progress. With each new finding, evolutionists say, we learn more about how evolution occurred. Is this true or simply a case of partisanship in science? How can we tell?"

SCREEEEEEEEEEEEECH! Dor sho gha! Their conclusion is so epic!

The fact of evolution is a necessary consequence of the metaphysical assumptions evolutionists make. Metaphysical assumptions are assumptions that do not derive from science. They are made independent of science. These metaphysical assumptions that evolutionists make would be difficult to defend as necessarily true outside of evolutionary circles, but within evolution their truth is not controversial."

LMAO! The fundies accusing SCIENTISTS of making metaphysical assertions on biodiversity??? BONG!!!!!!!!!!! THEY OWE ME A NEW IRONY METER!!!!!!!

Tuesday, July 28, 2009


Sometimes you just have to see it to believe it.

Infinite Force: "Are you guys still holding on to your MACROevolution?

Question for the both of you? How long have you guys been building on MACROevolution?"

Feklahr: "How long have you been practicing logical fallacies and shooting loaded questions?"

Infinite Force: "What YOU call logical fallacies is natural to me since six years of age.

Shooting loaded questions? Well if this what I think it is I’ve started at 6 or 7 years of problem solving by asking myself question all the time and learning thyself. gonna answer my question?"

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Epic :headdesk:

As only "once_more" can: "Well see now; you learned something today. Adaptation can include speciation and still not be evolution.
:) "

Monday, June 15, 2009

High School Science FTW!

I really love being able to post stuff like this, it makes being a blogger worthwhile. Knowing that an 18 year old student can perform this level of scientific scrutiny just mends so many wounds of scientific ignorance that I often see run rampant. Jessica Terry, this Klingon hails you, "QAPLAH!"

NBC: "When doctors didn't give a Washington state high school student the answers she wanted, she took matters into her own hands.

Eighteen-year-old Jessica Terry, brought slides of her own intestinal tissue into her AP science class and correctly diagnosed herself with Crohn's disease."

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Citation Needed FTW!

Pathlights: "Consider these facts, which were uncovered by Gentry’s research:

(1) The major basement rocks on our planet (granite) did not originate from the gradual cooling of molten lava, but came into being in their present solid form. That fact completely disproves the Big Bang and every evolutionary theory of the origins of stars and our world.

(2) Those major rock formations came into existence within a space of less than three minutes time! Incredible? Yes! But scientific evidence confirms it.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Thursday, May 21, 2009

So few much FAIL.

In response to science recently uncovering an interesting and unique fossil, Darwinius masillae, glass bottom boat enthusiast Josh Greenberger decided to get all retarded over at Topix about the situation.

However, nothing on this planet could defeat the FAIL power of this one little gem:

Josh Greenberger: "One fossil is NOT evidence."


Dor sho gha! I should have known better than to underestimate the power of fundies, peep this beaut!!!

GBCE: "fucking atheist scientists, if i had found that fossil, i would have destroyed it. why can't you leave christians alone with your bullshit theory of nothing?"

Guy'cha!!! BONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thursday, May 14, 2009


The stupid just needs to die.

Another Guest: "Even science, and the "strong methodology" you describe are still based on naive realism. You can offer no proof using the scientific method to prove science, or reality is "real" - so why should there be proof of God?


Strong atheism also provides its own set of beliefs with no scientific "proof", and could prove to be far more dangerous to society than religion ever has been. Religion is something you have a freedom to follow or not. Moral atheism is something imposed on a populace by the state, with "experts" and "scientists" dispensing edicts supposedly backed up by science, although more likely to be driven by the whims of their political sponsors."

Monday, May 4, 2009

King of FAIL

If T Rex is King of the Dinosaurs, girasas (and their prophet, Brenda) are the Kings of FAIL!

brenda6: "If you analyze what data we do have, you will see that someone (Jesus Christ, in particular) was an example of what happens to a human being when the girasas descend and begin to live in them. Since Jesus Christ was killed, am I to assume that humanity would reject an invader of this sort? Let's say we could open the Congress to the actions of this kingdom upon just the people here in America. Let's say that Congress votes that we desire this experience and that those who are capable of sharing it and promulgating it and expanding it to others are rewarded by our government because our government has decided that this is a favorable activity to be involved in. Now how does the rest of the world react? How do our citizens who don't want it to happen to them react? Would it result in wars? Would there be inferiority complexes? Would you as a human actively seek this experience over other experiences that are available to us in life? Or do we have to fall victim to this kingdom and do we only allow it to happen when there is no choice or foreseeable way to be excluded? Instead of accepting it and making the best of it, will people become militant and elect to eliminate it from the earth? Will there be a battle for the earth between humans and girasas and will humans die for harboring this kingdom within them? Also, some people may have trouble in the event of change. Would it drive anyone crazy if their government and peers attempted to consider the opportunities given to us by girasas over the opportunity to live autonomous?"

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

The left side of my body is numb and I smell burnt toast

Renuo Fides: "The general hypothesis of ID CAN be tested by the scientific method - although not as it pertains to "naturally" occurring life forms."

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Just nO RLY?

marksman11: "Ok and there are no rings around Saturn either. Study the firmament from people who have. Learn grasshopper, learn! Ever heard of those HUGE drawings in South America? A hummingbird, insect, etc.....How do you think they drew them? The book of JOB which is the oldest book of the bible says the morning stars sang to JOB. What causes a radio to recieve? It's crystals. What would this firmament be made of? Crystaline. Do the stars put out cosmic vibrations? Absolutely. So what would have happened when these vibrations hit the crystaline firmament? That's right, the morning stars sang to JOB."

Thursday, April 16, 2009

O RLY? - Life forms edition

John Q. Public: "I interrupted after the professor told us that carbon based life was all that there was. I told him about sulphur based life forms discovered in the Gulf of Mexico, thier proximity to hydrogen sulfied rich natural gas vents on the sea floor and described the tubes these lifeforms looked like. I also insisted this all took place with no light."
(The rest of his rant is as insightful as this snippet is!)

Back to our regularly scheduled FAIL!

Rick: "Parting the Red Sea doesn't fit too well into your scientific models of gravity, surface tension, etc."

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Intelligent Design...OWNED.

To paraphrase the context for this post, it was found recently in a rather drab "teach both sides/academic freedom/no science should be excluded" post regarding evolution/ID. The following was a response to intelligent design and 'I'm saying "no Scientific studies should be excluded "'.

Nuggin: "And we're saying "No scientific studies have ever been excluded." The problem here is that what you consider a "scientific study" the rest of the world considers "a letter to the editor". Science is rigorous. It has standards. If you don't achieve those standards you aren't doing science."

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Take me out to the FAIL game...

Robert Stevens: "I want to ad the most annoying thing about Atheist is they give The Christians too much of the soap box. The Atheist are like The Red Sox and they believe they could make a deal with The Yankees that in August of 2009 they'll play a 7 games series , and that'll be The World Series. It's a bizarre combination of disrespect and enjoying arguing with them the most. Again no one has the right to boycott any groups scientific studies , I could see debating on what school level should a science be studied or pre-requirements. As a New Ager I like ID with a pre-requirement of evolution studies , from their you have support , counter or completly disregard evolution options. In a University setting disagreeing with you professor does not equal failure. With responcible review boards this coarse could be "The Next big thing." See it'll happen anyway , you're just slowing science down , and possible your very own agenda. You could have your Ausust "World Series" but MLB will archieve The World Series as it happens in October & possible part of November."

Thursday, April 9, 2009


Dr. Lee Spetner: "Finally, the example of mutations in the B cells of the immune system carries no weight as an example of a mutation that adds information. Although these mutations do add information to the B-cell genome, they cannot be applied to evolution for the reasons I laid out above."

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Hooray for fail!

Robert Stevens: "Make it perfectly clear. Proving ID does not diprove Evolution. It may not even prove God. All it could prove is Extra Terrestrial. God would be E.T unless he stays in the ocean. Let's face it you guys fear ID just like religious zealots once feared you. Just imagine in the 22nd century or so ID crowd will be attempting to silence a more advanced alternative.

And it is fundalmentelism that hold you guys back from seeking alternatives. Face it your science is a slug in the scentific community. Let's watch the cat family and see when they develope wind gliding abilities. Yeah you might get that in 200 years. You should be excited to see something new. Face it you're not into science. You're fanatics."

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Cannot...Unsee...THE AGONY!!!

Holy running fuck, I don't even know what to say about this one!

Robert Stevens: "It's the other way around. Mysticism came first , and scientific method falls under mysticism , and I believe the comments being posted here by Atheist prove my point. Mysticism falls mainly under the science of Charisma. One part of Mysticism is the art of having others believe what I say. The Atheist here live in such a small box. You guys are not interested in science. You're interested in retarding science. Excluding parts of the tree. For the most part , your greatest scientific conversation could be which generation of people stop getting wisdom teeth or stop growing pinkies. Then there's alot of you can't prove that , he should not be aloud to say this. Maybe there are a few topics you like. I would guess stem cell research , ocean life and of cource animal breeding."

Monday, March 30, 2009

FAIL Super-saturation!

I have never seen so much FAIL so tightly packed together!

honest: "Well Dave, evolution is not a fact, it is still a theory. Until you can take a money and watch it turn into a human that you can call it a fact. Just because a few skulls have been found that seem to support the theory of evolution doesnt mean that it actually occured. For all we know it could have been different species of primates now extinct. If evoulution did occur why is it still not taking place today? As for separation of church and state the original meaning meant by the founders of our great nation was that we would not have a government mandated religion such as if found in some countries in the middle east. They in no way wanted God to be removed from government. Have you ever noticed that Congress starts everyday with a prayer? You Dave are the one who needs some educating. Both evolution and creationalism are theories. To be a fact you need irrefutable evidence which neither has. My best advice for you is to ask God yourself when you get to the other side. Unless of course you are an athiest that your just out of luck arent you"

Friday, March 20, 2009


HEY MIDDLE AMERICA (again...): "so do you think that the accepted big bang theory was sounds just like the biblical accounts of creation"

Irreducibly FAIL...SQUARED!

Here's a double dose from a moron on Topix! Dor sho gha!

HEY MIDDLE AMERICA: "these silly questions are nothing but a diversion from the fact that you can't refute the statement that darinism cannot explai the irreducibly complex systems that make up cells and as such by darwin's own words:

" if one could find an organ or structure that could not have been formed by "numerous, successive, slight modifications," his "theory would absolutely break down" (Darwin 1859, 191).

and irreducibly complex systems are indeed a structure

so take up the challenge because so far nobody has ever produced a paper published in the jme that details how such complex systems were built using a darwinian framework"

HEY MIDDLE AMERICA: "that's not how it works...because the fable of evolution has stated that evolution of such irreducibly complex systems must occur for the theory to be valid it is up to the proponents of said fable to produce the needed proof to back it up...the mistake you and your ilk made was to prematurely declare evolution fact when it was never really proven in the first place"

Wednesday, March 18, 2009


Yep, the much talked about flying car is finally here. Terrafugia has manufactured a two-seater called the Transition. And, in 30 seconds, it can be transformed from an extremely ugly automobile into an honest-to-goodness plane that goes about 115 mph.


#14 is my favourite. BTW, that whole site is just filled with FAIL fun!

Missing Universe Museum: "Students, give this test to your teachers. When they fail it, ask them why they are teaching this nonsense! Teachers, give this test to your students if you really want them to know the truth about evolution! 1. Which evolved first, male or female?
2. How many millions of years elapsed between the first male and first female?
3. List at least 9 of the false assumptions made with radioactive dating methods.
4. Why hasn't any extinct creature re-evolved after millions of years?
5. Which came first: ...the eye, ...the eyelid, ...the eyebrow, ...the eye sockets, ...the eye muscles, ...the eye lashes, ...the tear ducts, ...the brain's interpretation of light?
6. How many millions of years between each in question 5?
7. If we all evolved from a common ancestor, why can't all the different species mate with one another and produce fertile offspring?
8. List any of the millions of creatures in just five stages of its evolution showing the progression of a new organ of any kind. When you have done this, you can collect the millions of dollars in rewards offered for proof of evolution!
9. Why is it that the very things that would prove Evolution (transitional forms) are still missing?
10. Explain why something as complex as human life could happen by chance, but something as simple as a coin must have a creator. (Show your math solution.)
11. Why aren't any fossils or coal or oil being formed today?
12. List 50 vestigial or useless organs or appendages in the human body.
13. Why hasn't anyone collected the millions of dollars in rewards for proof of evolution?
14. If life began hundreds of millions of years ago, why is the earth still under populated?
15. Why hasn't evolution duplicated all species on all continents?"

Tuesday, March 17, 2009


joe: "if you can cite a site whose perpose if to attack creactionist then any site posting is valid. People can start qouting the bible. Do you really think that is a legit source? For that matter is any .org a legit source"

Monday, March 16, 2009

Brenda6: "The seven races cover the entire period of man's existence on the earth. We all know of dinosaurs today, but 100 years ago when Blavatsky wrote THE SECRET DOCTRINE, they were a rarity. The human kingdom began its descent into matter, so she reports, as an etheric race. The first race hovered above the earth which was then inhabited by dinosaurs. How were our physical bodies developed? "


I know this technically isn't "Science Fail"...but...yeah.

Iowa-1, FAIL-0

Iowa Gives The Thumbs Down to the Discovery Institute:

The “Evolution Academic Freedom Act,” based on the model language promoted by the Discovery Institute, never even made it out of the relevant subcommittee in the Iowa legislature.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Science AND Math FAIL!

Todd Wood: "Anyone who knows me at all knows that I break down creationist biology into four main components: design, natural evil, systematics, speciation, and biogeography."
(How many components did YOU count? BONG!!!)

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Take this FAIL and shove it!

Barb: "For ID evidence: how do we get the sexes, sexual reproduction, organs, self-healing skin, hearts that beat for a lifetime without any external energy source, our computer-like brains, our eyes and the ability to see colors?"

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Scientific defense FAIL!

This entire article is chock-full of FAIL, but the good old "Second Law of Thermodynamics Fail" might be one of my most favorite of all time. (BTW, it's called "the sun", ignoramus.)

Edward N. Chase: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics is often stated as the law of increasing entropy: "A natural process always takes place in such a direction as to cause an increase in the entropy of the universe." (John Williams, "Modern Physics," Page 210). The effect of this law is that unless there is a purposeful source of energy operating in a system, the various parts, molecules, etc., become less and less organized and more and more random."

Monday, March 9, 2009

Yes, there really are this many people that FAIL at biology

voicecrying: "If Genesis is true, we are descendants of an incestuous relationship. However, if evolution is true, we are descendants of a bestial relationship - the first man/woman to evolve had to mate with a sub-human (i.e. beast) partner of the opposite sex."

Monday, March 2, 2009

Fooled you!

Ha ha! Still updating! There is too much science fail to stop at Iowa retardation! LOOK!

happypioneer: "IS EVOLUTION REALLY SCIENTIFIC, THEN EXPLAIN THIS- The "scientific method" is as follows: Observe what happens: based on those observations, form a theory as to what may be true; test the theory by further observations and by experiments; and watch to see if the predictions based on the theory are fulfilled. Is this the method followed by those who believe in and teach evolution? Hardly, if they did, they would be able to explain and provide scientific evidence about how the first cell was nutured. Until science can prove this EVOLUTION IS JUST A THEORY. AND SCIENTIST CAN NOT EXPLAIN THIS IN ANY SCIENTIC WAY.(EVOLUTION FACT---------NOT YET)."

Friday, February 27, 2009

BONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Iowa HF 183)

I am so dismayed by this news, I am not going to update again until the outcome of this bill.

Thanks to Rep. Rod Roberts, R-Carroll, we have this cute little mess here in Iowa now:

Evolutionary freedom

Teachers in public schools and postsecondary institutions who objectively present ideas on evolution, creationism, intelligent design or other information "relevant to the full range of scientific views" would be protected from discipline, denial of tenure, termination or other discrimination under HF 183 introduced by Rep. Rod Roberts, R-Carroll. The bill also requires students be evaluated based on their understanding of course materials and not penalized for subscribing to a particular position of view regarding chemical or biological evolution.

Read more:


Update: The DI can suck it!

This person is firmly perched on the "I-Fail Tower"

Tayune: "Meanwhile, if you know anything about Genetics at all - you'd know it actually disproves the theory of evolution. Human evolution at least. Animals are different than humans after all."


BTW, have you ever noticed how Science Fail is often coupled with Spelling Fail, Grammar Fail, Composition Fail...

Thursday, February 26, 2009


Robert Stevens: "When i say everything is a science , I mean EVERYTHING , there are even those that now claim masturbation has sciences , folks I kid you not. If I went on with expaination it may be considered spamming."

Not technically science, but still FAIL

Jim Ryan: "I started telling teachers that kids need to use body and mind together in the learning process, because of how much faster they will learn, how much smartewr they will get and how much happier they'd be, since about 1997--on-line. About a year later I started hearing of a teacher here or there starting to do what I was telling them."

queen kira: "The layering of the Earth's crust is due to hydrologic sorting from the Flood. The fossils are found in the order in which they were buried, not the order in which they "evolved"."

Sooooomewhere, over the FAILbow...

In response to: If a rainbow is God's Promise that he will never again flood the Earth,
Does this mean that light refraction and the color spectrum didn't exist before Noah?

Mr. John: "In those times the atmosphere is not the same with what it is today. There was no vapor in the atmosphere to cause the refraction of light."

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Noah's Ark and the Great FAIL!

[In response to evidence that large wooden ships simply do not work]

OrangeWIZARD: "What do ships have? A hull.

What snapped on the wooden ship? The hull.

Does the ark have a hull? No.

The. Ark. Is. A. Hollow. Rectangular. Prism."

Steaming Pile of Fail

Because confirmable observations and generating experimental data are impossible for unique events like life's origin and macroevolution theory, world-famous evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr prompts evolutionists to construct historical narratives to try to explain evolutionary events or processes. In other words, stories are all evolutionists can muster to support macroevolution theory. If macroevolution theory, which must rest on faith in a story and is considered to be scientific, why not the creation story. With that in mind, it is no wonder the molecules-to-man debate has persisted for 150 years."


Now, even with as FAIL as that was, there was WIN in the comments section! QAPLAH!

tricoteuse: "I used to be the Op Ed of a community college newspaper. I wrote most of my editorials the night of layout, in about an hour. I still managed to be more accurate and well-informed, and present more (accurate and reliable) evidence and support for my positions than this sad little piece in a "real paper." COMMUNITY COLLEGE. Do they let just ANYONE write just ANYTHING these days? Do they even read this stuff before printing it? "Opinion" doesn't mean "load of unsupported bollocks I'm printing just because I can," at least not in any remotely respectable publication. (Again, we did better than this at COMMUNITY COLLEGE for pete's sake.) I don't really need to comment on the specific glaring examples of Epic Fail in this piece because most of the comments preceding mine have already done so beautifully. So I'll say no more. But seriously. EPIC fail."

Ladies and gentlemen, they felt that burn at the Alamo. Dor sho gha!

Monday, February 23, 2009

This is a fail that needs to die.

I see this argument from ignorant fucktards more than I care to say. It needs to die.

Sir Lucario: "Well "logically", according to the rabid religion-haters' little theory of evolution, gays would have been weeded out by natural selection. If they are born the way they are, and they can't "get it up" in the presence of a woman, then they cannot procreate."

Some people fail out of general principle

Ray Martinez: "Immutability is not harmed by artificial breeding. Immutability refers to species that exist in the undisturbed wild. Wherever a new species is found----that is where it was introduced by a direct act of special creation ex materia. There is no other way for species to appear."

Friday, February 20, 2009

This literally made my eyes hurt.

I could have chosen any number of paragraphs in this long, droning article (complete with atrocious punctuation to the point where it becomes unreadable), but the selection provided should give a good glimpse at the Science Fail.

Adam McLean:
"The central point within our consciousness, our "spirit" in the hermetic sense, can now be seen as an entity that can work to control quantum probabilities. To our "spirits" our brain is a quantum sea providing a rich realm in which it can incarnate and manifest patterns down into the electrical/chemical impulses of the nervous system. (It has been calculated that the number of interconnections existing in our brains far exceeds the number of atoms in the whole universe - so in this sense the microcosm truly mirrors the macrocosm!). Our "spirit" can through quantum borrowing momentarily press a certain order into this sea and this manifests as a thought, emotion, etc. Such an ordered state can only exist momentarily, before our spirit or point of consciousness is forced to jump and move to other regions of the brain, where at that moment the pattern of probability waves for the particles in these nerve cells, can reflect the form that our spirit is trying to work with."

Fail-sil record!

JPr: "I don't believe EVERY fossil FITS perfectly with the evolution theory. I can't look them up right now (too lazy). But, not every fossil FITS with the theory of evolution. Yes, maybe evolutionist don't use the term of missing links, but doesn't mean that there is none missing links that have been found.(At least you know what i mean by missing links.) And I don't believe evolution was just done like crazy. I believe, and is true that what Darwin observed were micro evolutions. Not actual evolutions how they are defined now."


This gives me a chance to vocalize something I have noticed on Topix. It seems a disproportionate amount of the "Evolution Critics" that post the really, REALLY inane uneducated babble are from North Carolina. What this means, I don't know. However, it is an unsettling trend.

Thursday, February 19, 2009


TheBundo: "Mammoths quick-frozen with undigested tropical vegitation in their stomachs? Again, explained in written HISTORY. The earth was surrounded by a water vapor that gave a more even temperature, a true greenhouse effect. When it was let loose, it flooded the earth, exposed the polar extremities to the cold of space where it was further, on average, from the sun, as we still see, and got cold fast. The lower spots ended up sinking further, becoming the oceans and seas. The higher spots became even bigger mountains, with severely tilting strata. The dinosaur bones when down under the seas and where covered with silt running off the higher areas to the lower as the water retreated. So many things man scrambled around trying to explain are all easily explained by the flood."

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

How Can I Have A Blog Called "Science Fail"...

...without Kent "Dr. Dino" Hovind?

Here is Soldier for Salvation's take on Hovind "science": "Evolutionists, what is your answer for how the mammoths got frozen in place?

Here is an explanation from a REAL scientist.

An ice meteor came flying through space and crashed into Earth. Due to the Earth's magnetic field, all of the ice fell and gathered on the poles (top and bottom). Also, the mammoths were instantly frozen in place. Also, the remnants flew out into space and created the polar caps of Mars and the icy rings of Saturn (what's your explanation for how those got there?).

If the mammoths got frozen in place, which they did, it couldn't have happened gradually. They would have decomposed. But they got frozen practically in place and instantly. This raises suspicion."

Friday, February 13, 2009

I am speechless.

Chicago Guy: "Would you be willing to accept Evolution if humans weren't part of the fossil record?"


Hugo: "Atheist do you know if the moon was a centimeter closer to Earth we would have tidal waves? How can you not see someone put it there for a purpose? Even athiest can understand an engineering pincipal?"

Some people fail more than others

I am not going to post the entire ranting diatribe here, but I will give you a select nugget that should give you enough insight to understand this person's view on the human species.

Ranting, incoherent fucktard emails Pharyngula:
"When these people left there was a large group of men who took off and ended up in Africa. Some of these men went to Borneo and caught female Orangutans and sailed across to South America and had sex with the female Orangutans and created the Indian. And the men who stayed in Africa caught female Gorillas and had sex with them and created the Black man. When scientists found the bones they thought we came from a female Chimpanzee. But it wasn't a natural evolution it was a man made evolution. That' where Bigfoot, Sasquatch, Orangutan man, Yeti and the Skunk Ape comes from. They are half man and half Gorilla and half man and half Orangutan. When scientists find drawings in caves they were put there by Bigfoot and the Orangutan man. Scientists are either finding freaks of nature or their making mistakes or their findings things and they just don't know what they are."

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

How Much Science Fail Can YOU Fit In One Post?

Gomenasai: "as far as walking through walls, I believe the Lord Jesus's glorified body literally oscillates at a very high frequency. A rough comparison could be how visible light (in the electromagnetic spectrum) operates at a lower frequency than x-rays or gamma rays and cannot pass through a solid wall like the other 2 (although I realize radio does, faster doesnt necesarily facilitate this atribute, rather, a the "right" frequency to accomplish this. Its said though that love and happieness constitute higher vibrational states in us, not nearly what im talking about tho with Jesus) Could be wrong but the Lord certainly has made a reallly strange universe and frequency is one of the weirdest (and perhaps most prevalent, as I heard someone mention everything being product of a strings vibration, per se)"