Thursday, May 14, 2009
The stupid just needs to die.
Another Guest: "Even science, and the "strong methodology" you describe are still based on naive realism. You can offer no proof using the scientific method to prove science, or reality is "real" - so why should there be proof of God?
Strong atheism also provides its own set of beliefs with no scientific "proof", and could prove to be far more dangerous to society than religion ever has been. Religion is something you have a freedom to follow or not. Moral atheism is something imposed on a populace by the state, with "experts" and "scientists" dispensing edicts supposedly backed up by science, although more likely to be driven by the whims of their political sponsors."