Showing posts with label O RLY?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label O RLY?. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Marksman's Train Wreck of a Fail


The one, the only, Marksman11: "Here you go redefining terms again. Living means living, and the Law of Biogenesis never mentions the word "biological".

Definitions of Law of biogenesis on the Web:

Biogenesis is the process of lifeforms producing other lifeforms, e.g. a spider lays eggs, which develop into spiders. It may also refer to biochemical processes of production in living organisms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_biogenesis

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&defl=en&q=define:Law+of+biogenesis&sa=X&ei=Dy47TKLnNoWBlAfTue3SBw&ved=0CBIQkAE

Show me in that definition the word "biological". It isn't there. That is just more of you're made up BS.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Not science, but definitely FAIL


SMalice: "Opinions don't really have to be rational, they are opinions and do not have to be substantiated by evidence. To try and do so is a waste of time."

Friday, January 8, 2010

The ABCs of FAIL


(This is just so much fail, I had to put it up...and yes, the list unfortunately goes to Z.)

Christian Worldview Examiner's "ABCs of Evolution":

A - absurd, amusing, asinine. That theory of evolution that is trying to be passed off is pretty amusing if you think about it, absurd at best and down right asinine if you think about it too hard.

B - bull hockey, baloney, B.S. Baloney, I say. You expect me to believe that bull hockey. Evolution theory is nothing but B.S. from the getgo.

C - Cinderella, cute - Evolution reminds us of Cinderella - pumpkin seed (don't know where it's from) becomes pumpkin (don't know how that happened) then the pumpkin became a carriage (sans the fairy godmother, of course.)

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Epic :headdesk:

As only "once_more" can: "Well see now; you learned something today. Adaptation can include speciation and still not be evolution.
.
:) "

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Citation Needed FTW!


Pathlights: "Consider these facts, which were uncovered by Gentry’s research:

(1) The major basement rocks on our planet (granite) did not originate from the gradual cooling of molten lava, but came into being in their present solid form. That fact completely disproves the Big Bang and every evolutionary theory of the origins of stars and our world.

(2) Those major rock formations came into existence within a space of less than three minutes time! Incredible? Yes! But scientific evidence confirms it.
"

Thursday, May 14, 2009

DIAF


The stupid just needs to die.

Another Guest: "Even science, and the "strong methodology" you describe are still based on naive realism. You can offer no proof using the scientific method to prove science, or reality is "real" - so why should there be proof of God?

...

Strong atheism also provides its own set of beliefs with no scientific "proof", and could prove to be far more dangerous to society than religion ever has been. Religion is something you have a freedom to follow or not. Moral atheism is something imposed on a populace by the state, with "experts" and "scientists" dispensing edicts supposedly backed up by science, although more likely to be driven by the whims of their political sponsors."

Monday, May 4, 2009

King of FAIL


If T Rex is King of the Dinosaurs, girasas (and their prophet, Brenda) are the Kings of FAIL!

brenda6: "If you analyze what data we do have, you will see that someone (Jesus Christ, in particular) was an example of what happens to a human being when the girasas descend and begin to live in them. Since Jesus Christ was killed, am I to assume that humanity would reject an invader of this sort? Let's say we could open the Congress to the actions of this kingdom upon just the people here in America. Let's say that Congress votes that we desire this experience and that those who are capable of sharing it and promulgating it and expanding it to others are rewarded by our government because our government has decided that this is a favorable activity to be involved in. Now how does the rest of the world react? How do our citizens who don't want it to happen to them react? Would it result in wars? Would there be inferiority complexes? Would you as a human actively seek this experience over other experiences that are available to us in life? Or do we have to fall victim to this kingdom and do we only allow it to happen when there is no choice or foreseeable way to be excluded? Instead of accepting it and making the best of it, will people become militant and elect to eliminate it from the earth? Will there be a battle for the earth between humans and girasas and will humans die for harboring this kingdom within them? Also, some people may have trouble in the event of change. Would it drive anyone crazy if their government and peers attempted to consider the opportunities given to us by girasas over the opportunity to live autonomous?"

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

The left side of my body is numb and I smell burnt toast


Renuo Fides: "The general hypothesis of ID CAN be tested by the scientific method - although not as it pertains to "naturally" occurring life forms."

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Just nO RLY?


marksman11: "Ok and there are no rings around Saturn either. Study the firmament from people who have. Learn grasshopper, learn! Ever heard of those HUGE drawings in South America? A hummingbird, insect, etc.....How do you think they drew them? The book of JOB which is the oldest book of the bible says the morning stars sang to JOB. What causes a radio to recieve? It's crystals. What would this firmament be made of? Crystaline. Do the stars put out cosmic vibrations? Absolutely. So what would have happened when these vibrations hit the crystaline firmament? That's right, the morning stars sang to JOB."

Thursday, April 16, 2009

O RLY? - Life forms edition


John Q. Public: "I interrupted after the professor told us that carbon based life was all that there was. I told him about sulphur based life forms discovered in the Gulf of Mexico, thier proximity to hydrogen sulfied rich natural gas vents on the sea floor and described the tubes these lifeforms looked like. I also insisted this all took place with no light."
(The rest of his rant is as insightful as this snippet is!)

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Cannot...Unsee...THE AGONY!!!


Holy running fuck, I don't even know what to say about this one!

Robert Stevens: "It's the other way around. Mysticism came first , and scientific method falls under mysticism , and I believe the comments being posted here by Atheist prove my point. Mysticism falls mainly under the science of Charisma. One part of Mysticism is the art of having others believe what I say. The Atheist here live in such a small box. You guys are not interested in science. You're interested in retarding science. Excluding parts of the tree. For the most part , your greatest scientific conversation could be which generation of people stop getting wisdom teeth or stop growing pinkies. Then there's alot of you can't prove that , he should not be aloud to say this. Maybe there are a few topics you like. I would guess stem cell research , ocean life and of cource animal breeding."

Friday, March 20, 2009

O RLY? U FAIL!


HEY MIDDLE AMERICA (again...): "so do you think that the accepted big bang theory was evolution...it sounds just like the biblical accounts of creation"

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

THE FAIL HURTS!!!


#14 is my favourite. BTW, that whole site is just filled with FAIL fun!

Missing Universe Museum: "Students, give this test to your teachers. When they fail it, ask them why they are teaching this nonsense! Teachers, give this test to your students if you really want them to know the truth about evolution! 1. Which evolved first, male or female?
2. How many millions of years elapsed between the first male and first female?
3. List at least 9 of the false assumptions made with radioactive dating methods.
4. Why hasn't any extinct creature re-evolved after millions of years?
5. Which came first: ...the eye, ...the eyelid, ...the eyebrow, ...the eye sockets, ...the eye muscles, ...the eye lashes, ...the tear ducts, ...the brain's interpretation of light?
6. How many millions of years between each in question 5?
7. If we all evolved from a common ancestor, why can't all the different species mate with one another and produce fertile offspring?
8. List any of the millions of creatures in just five stages of its evolution showing the progression of a new organ of any kind. When you have done this, you can collect the millions of dollars in rewards offered for proof of evolution!
9. Why is it that the very things that would prove Evolution (transitional forms) are still missing?
10. Explain why something as complex as human life could happen by chance, but something as simple as a coin must have a creator. (Show your math solution.)
11. Why aren't any fossils or coal or oil being formed today?
12. List 50 vestigial or useless organs or appendages in the human body.
13. Why hasn't anyone collected the millions of dollars in rewards for proof of evolution?
14. If life began hundreds of millions of years ago, why is the earth still under populated?
15. Why hasn't evolution duplicated all species on all continents?"

Friday, February 27, 2009

This person is firmly perched on the "I-Fail Tower"


Tayune: "Meanwhile, if you know anything about Genetics at all - you'd know it actually disproves the theory of evolution. Human evolution at least. Animals are different than humans after all."

*********************************************************

BTW, have you ever noticed how Science Fail is often coupled with Spelling Fail, Grammar Fail, Composition Fail...

Thursday, February 26, 2009

O RLY?


Robert Stevens: "When i say everything is a science , I mean EVERYTHING , there are even those that now claim masturbation has sciences , folks I kid you not. If I went on with expaination it may be considered spamming."

Not technically science, but still FAIL


Jim Ryan: "I started telling teachers that kids need to use body and mind together in the learning process, because of how much faster they will learn, how much smartewr they will get and how much happier they'd be, since about 1997--on-line. About a year later I started hearing of a teacher here or there starting to do what I was telling them."

Sooooomewhere, over the FAILbow...


In response to: If a rainbow is God's Promise that he will never again flood the Earth,
Does this mean that light refraction and the color spectrum didn't exist before Noah?

Mr. John: "In those times the atmosphere is not the same with what it is today. There was no vapor in the atmosphere to cause the refraction of light."

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Noah's Ark and the Great FAIL!


[In response to evidence that large wooden ships simply do not work]

OrangeWIZARD: "What do ships have? A hull.

What snapped on the wooden ship? The hull.


Does the ark have a hull? No.


The. Ark. Is. A. Hollow. Rectangular. Prism."

Steaming Pile of Fail


Because confirmable observations and generating experimental data are impossible for unique events like life's origin and macroevolution theory, world-famous evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr prompts evolutionists to construct historical narratives to try to explain evolutionary events or processes. In other words, stories are all evolutionists can muster to support macroevolution theory. If macroevolution theory, which must rest on faith in a story and is considered to be scientific, why not the creation story. With that in mind, it is no wonder the molecules-to-man debate has persisted for 150 years."

*******************************************************************

Now, even with as FAIL as that was, there was WIN in the comments section! QAPLAH!

tricoteuse: "I used to be the Op Ed of a community college newspaper. I wrote most of my editorials the night of layout, in about an hour. I still managed to be more accurate and well-informed, and present more (accurate and reliable) evidence and support for my positions than this sad little piece in a "real paper." COMMUNITY COLLEGE. Do they let just ANYONE write just ANYTHING these days? Do they even read this stuff before printing it? "Opinion" doesn't mean "load of unsupported bollocks I'm printing just because I can," at least not in any remotely respectable publication. (Again, we did better than this at COMMUNITY COLLEGE for pete's sake.) I don't really need to comment on the specific glaring examples of Epic Fail in this piece because most of the comments preceding mine have already done so beautifully. So I'll say no more. But seriously. EPIC fail."

Ladies and gentlemen, they felt that burn at the Alamo. Dor sho gha!