Showing posts with label geology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label geology. Show all posts

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Citation Needed FTW!


Pathlights: "Consider these facts, which were uncovered by Gentry’s research:

(1) The major basement rocks on our planet (granite) did not originate from the gradual cooling of molten lava, but came into being in their present solid form. That fact completely disproves the Big Bang and every evolutionary theory of the origins of stars and our world.

(2) Those major rock formations came into existence within a space of less than three minutes time! Incredible? Yes! But scientific evidence confirms it.
"

Thursday, May 21, 2009

So few words...so much FAIL.


In response to science recently uncovering an interesting and unique fossil, Darwinius masillae, glass bottom boat enthusiast Josh Greenberger decided to get all retarded over at Topix about the situation.

However, nothing on this planet could defeat the FAIL power of this one little gem:

Josh Greenberger: "One fossil is NOT evidence."

*Update!*

Dor sho gha! I should have known better than to underestimate the power of fundies, peep this beaut!!!


GBCE: "fucking atheist scientists, if i had found that fossil, i would have destroyed it. why can't you leave christians alone with your bullshit theory of nothing?"

Guy'cha!!! BONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Just...no.


queen kira: "The layering of the Earth's crust is due to hydrologic sorting from the Flood. The fossils are found in the order in which they were buried, not the order in which they "evolved"."

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Noah's Ark and the Great FAIL!


[In response to evidence that large wooden ships simply do not work]

OrangeWIZARD: "What do ships have? A hull.

What snapped on the wooden ship? The hull.


Does the ark have a hull? No.


The. Ark. Is. A. Hollow. Rectangular. Prism."

Thursday, February 19, 2009

THE STUPID HURTS!-Redux


TheBundo: "Mammoths quick-frozen with undigested tropical vegitation in their stomachs? Again, explained in written HISTORY. The earth was surrounded by a water vapor that gave a more even temperature, a true greenhouse effect. When it was let loose, it flooded the earth, exposed the polar extremities to the cold of space where it was further, on average, from the sun, as we still see, and got cold fast. The lower spots ended up sinking further, becoming the oceans and seas. The higher spots became even bigger mountains, with severely tilting strata. The dinosaur bones when down under the seas and where covered with silt running off the higher areas to the lower as the water retreated. So many things man scrambled around trying to explain are all easily explained by the flood."

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

A Fail That Brings Me To A Serious Question


NephilimFree: "Your belief in evolution is absolutely irrelevant to its voracity. You can test it by trying to disbelieve the theory of gravity. Atheists aren't building anything. There are not enough of the to build anything. They create in their mind the perceptiion that they are doing so, then they believe it. All based upon a rejection of Jesus Christ. Guess what. The mathematics and astonomical explainations of the secular world are fashioned to provide an alternative to the truth. The Eath is not moving. Time-lapse star photography proves it."

***********************************************************

OK, if your eyes are done bleeding from the drivel, we arrive at my serious question:

IS THERE ANY ACTUAL VALID, NON-THEISTIC CRITICISM/REFUTATION OF EVOLUTION?

If anyone has the answer, please let me know. You don't have to register to post here, and I do not moderate ANY comments. From my experience, bar none, all "criticisms" of The Theory of Evolution are theistic in origin. If anyone has concrete evidence to the contrary, I would LOVE to see it.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

ASE called, you fail.


Jim Ryan:

"Consider the core, the mantle and the crust. How many underground rivers can science plot, as to their exact route? I sure hope scientists consider radiant heating and cooling? As the heat from the core rises, surely the underground rivers and such pull heat away from the surrounding rocks, as a radiator cools an auto. If not, it's possible that the heat would keep building until the earth litterally cooked. However, it's likely the oceans and such draw away heat as well. If rocks don't have ways of cooling, they retain that heat. The core must shed the heat."

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

It has to start somewhere...


In my online travels, I come across travesties of scientific injustice. People that watch too much tv and read too little often find themselves proclaiming scientific evidence that will shake the foundations of modern understanding. However, it is always bullcrap of the highest magnitude. I am not going to sit here and do point by points, I am just going to post the ignorance in all of it's glory.

I present simply, "Science Fail". Actual living, breathing people posted the nonsense I will present, and expected others to take it seriously.

Jim Ryan:

"--as the water builds behind a dam several hundred miles long, almost 4,000 feet wide and somne 175 meters deep, magma from the earths core must move in an opposing direction to compensate, and as it moves, it will cause the magnetic field to shift more--as the magma is forced in an opposing manner--outside the core of the planet, or so I believe--as one thing affects another--which affects another and so on."